We asked every SC congressional candidate about issues that matter. Read the full Q&As here.

McClatchy’s South Carolina opinion team set out to interview all 19 candidates on ballots in the state’s seven congressional districts ahead of the Nov. 5 election, and came close. Two did not reply. All of our Q&As are below.

Every candidate was emailed six questions and given 250 words for each answer as part of our endorsement process. We are publishing interviews edited for accuracy, clarity and style before we publish our endorsements so readers can assess the candidates on their own. Expect all our endorsements the week of Oct. 20.

Aides for Reps. William Timmons in the fourth congressional district and Russell Fry in the seventh congressional district acknowledged the surveys but neither candidate replied to them despite repeated requests and deadline extensions.

Early voting begins Oct. 21, and you can find a location here. Find your polling place, sample ballot and congressional district here. See a map of all the districts here. If this public service helps, please consider supporting our journalism here.

Your subscriptions and support make this massive undertaking possible, so thank you for reading our work. If you have questions about our interviews or endorsements, please email me.

Congressional District 1: Republican Mace vs. Democrat Moore

Incumbent U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: My top priority will be Lowcountry voters’ top priority. I share their clear concern with record-high inflation, cost of living and the increasing struggle to put food on the table. The next concern I hear from voters is about securing our southern border and reducing the rise in illegal immigrant crime and the influx of fentanyl claiming lives in South Carolina. Lastly, one of the other top priorities for Lowcountry voters is protecting women. In terms of international policy, our national security and the rise of terrorism against our ally Israel and U.S. assets overseas remain a top priority. As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, ensuring our active duty military are prepared for any foreign or domestic threat remains a top tier commitment in our work. In fact, as I write this, I’m on my way to a field hearing exploring advances in tech and cybersecurity at the Department of Defense.

Editor’s note: McClatchy’s South Carolina opinion team has a policy to refer to people who cross the border illegally as undocumented immigrants, avoiding words like “illegal” to describe them. We make rare exceptions for direct quotes or official documents. Rep. Nancy Mace’s description was published as submitted after she was offered the opportunity to change it and declined.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: As one of South Carolina’s leading pro-conservation lawmakers, I have always prioritized responsible stewardship for future generations while also championing America’s energy independence. I have consistently opposed drilling off South Carolina’s coast, and support legislation like the American Shores Protection Act to protect our coastline. I support advances and policy to help protect South Carolina’s coast from the storms, hurricanes and flooding we often see here. We’ve consistently led in acquiring authorizations to help local government projects in this endeavor. Simultaneously, we are committed to advancing our oil independence, particularly in the Permian Basin and understanding its vital importance to a strong American economy.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: We have been a firm supporter of continuing the construction of the border wall, and voted to build over 900 miles of it along our southern border. With a rock-solid track record of policy to secure the border, we’ve voted for key legislation like the End the Border Catastrophe Act and the Secure the Border Act. While the Biden-Harris administration left the border wide open and invited illegal immigrants in, we’ve worked to introduce legislation to reinforce secure border policies, such as our Northern Triangle Asylum Cooperative Agreement Reimplementation Act. And just last month the U.S. House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to approve my bill, the Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: We are unapologetically pro-woman and pro-life. The vast majority of voters want time limits on abortion and by and large the consensus is second trimester. When I was in the state legislature, I authored the amendment to provide exceptions for rape and incest where it did not previously exist. I was the first U.S. House member to propose a resolution to protect in vitro fertilization access when an Alabama Supreme Court ruling threatened IVF earlier this year. I’ve also consistently voted for and drafted legislation protecting contraception and contraceptives. I have a significant number of bills protecting women. I introduced the Greater Access to Contraceptive Options Act to make it easier for women to receive over-the-counter birth control. I’ve co-sponsored legislation in the House to protect IVF. I’ve authored legislation to strengthen the revenge porn civil tort first created under the Violence Against Women Act at the federal level and also authored a bill to make it a criminal act under Title 18 since the 2022 Violence Against Women Act did not make revenge porn a criminal act. I’ve authored a voyeurism bill to create a civil and criminal action within the federal code of laws since those were not included in the 2022 Violence Against Women Act. And last month the House voted to approve my Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: Voters aren’t asking about J6. They are asking about inflation and government spending, which is the fault of BOTH parties. Voters ask a lot of questions about illegal immigration and securing the border. And voters care deeply about women’s issues. I thought this question and answer series would be about the issues voters care about, not leftist media with an agenda. By the way, J6 polls at close to zero in terms of issues voters care about. Also, I was pretty damn clear about J6 when it happened.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponent in this election?

A: Unlike our opponent who is a “Bernie Bro” and who has lied to Lowcountry voters about his endorsements , we actually share Lowcountry voters’ values. I’ve proven no one will work harder than I will for South Carolina and for the Lowcountry. I’ve proven my work ethic by my legislation and in the fights I’ve taken to both sides of the aisle during my short time in Congress. Serving the Lowcountry has been the honor of my lifetime, and I look forward to continuing to serve each and every one of you.

Michael B. Moore

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: If elected to Congress, my top priority at home will be to fight for policies that specifically make our district stronger and safer. We need to prioritize the economy so working families aren’t having to make impossible choices between groceries and childcare. We need to prioritize protecting women’s reproductive freedom so women in the Lowcountry can make decisions about their own bodies and aren’t traveling to other states in order to receive critical medical care. We need to prioritize policies that will make our especially-vulnerable coastal district more resilient to rising waters and temperatures. With where we are as a country, state and district, I believe we need representatives in Congress that are ready to take on all of these fights. It is a full-time job, after all.

Looking abroad, we must support our ally Ukraine, which is in the crosshairs of Russian imperialism. My opponent consistently has voted against legislation that could turn the tide of the war, allowing an American partner in Eastern Europe to push off Russian aggression. Above all else, members of Congress must be committed to defending democracy, not dictators.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: The impact of climate change is a reality that risks the stability of the Lowcountry in every imaginable way. Our district is on the frontlines of this issue, and how we respond will impact the well-being of every single resident of Congressional District One – or certainly our children and grandchildren. We need leadership that will take this threat seriously, finding both solutions and opportunities for our district to not only survive, but thrive. My opponent voted against the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, which provided incentives for climate-focused jobs in the Lowcountry — such as Redwood Materials’ incoming battery factory at Camp Hall, which will employ 1,500 people in the district. While Nancy Mace took credit for this funding after calling it part of a “socialist wish list,” we need a representative who will take the lead on fighting for opportunities that infuse our local economy with jobs and funding while pushing back the effects of climate change.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: First of all, had I been a standing member of Congress at the time, I would have voted for the bipartisan Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, a bill that Donald Trump instructed Republicans to reject (our current representative followed suit). This bill was supported by the National Border Patrol Council and would have increased the number of immigration judges and border agents, as well as improved fentanyl detection capabilities.

My opponent voted against this legislation — then introduced new legislation regarding undocumented immigrants despite similar laws already being in place. She continues to waste the valuable time of our government and use her position to demonize immigrants to appease Donald Trump. Regardless of your feelings toward the former president, he should not be dictating our current border or immigration policy. We need to root out the systemic causes of migration and implement immigration policies that reflect American values, not fear-mongering and political games. I’ve seen firsthand the humanitarian crisis at our southern border, and I am committed to fighting for solutions that keep Americans safe and provide a pathway to U.S. citizenship for those deserving.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: I’m the only candidate in this race who has consistently advocated for a woman’s right to bodily autonomy. Unlike my opponent, who has endorsed controversial abortion legislation in the past, I believe women should be able to make these decisions without fear of government intrusion. That starts with codifying Roe v. Wade, which protected mothers, wives and daughters for decades. I’m an advocate for exceptions to abortion bans relating to rape, incest and threat to the life of the mother. Without these commonsense exceptions, legislators risk the integrity and lives of women who are victims of crimes and in complex health situations.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: The events that took place at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 were an affront to our democracy facilitated by extremists with a disregard for the Constitution. We need a leader willing to rise above the kind of hateful rhetoric that fanned the flames that day, which ultimately led to the assault of 140 officers and death of five officers in the following months. While my opponent condemned these events, she was quick to vote against increased funding for capitol police officers. She also called for former President Trump to never hold office again after Jan. 6, but is now one of his most vocal advocates in Congress and follows his directive on critical votes. We know this country is better than the actions that took place that day, and I know many of the voters I’ve spoken with in the Lowcountry are ready to close this embarrassing chapter and move forward electing a government that works for them.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponent in this election?

A: To put it plainly, I am ready to fight for the people of the First Congressional District. My ancestors have been in the Lowcountry since the 1790s — this is my familial home and I want to make sure it is here and thriving long after I am gone. People choose to come here to raise their families, start their businesses and retire. Our next representative in Congress needs to take this responsibility seriously. After nearly 40 years in the private sector, I will bring the experience, commonsense and leadership our next representative needs in order to work across party lines and get things done for our district.

Congressional District 2: Democrat Robinson vs. Republican Wilson

David Robinson II

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: My primary goal as a member of Congress is to address the inflation that is currently affecting our nation. Despite the flourishing economy, families are not feeling the improvement of the economy when they buy the basics like food. Therefore, it is imperative that we find a viable solution to this issue.

As a retired U.S. Army veteran, it’s also my priority to defend our democracy and support and create legislation that expands American rights, enhances voters rights, and defends reproductive rights and other civil rights.

Additionally, I am concerned about finding solutions to the missing American crises that our nation faces each year. My family and I have been personally affected. My son, geologist Daniel Robinson, is among the more than 600,000 Americans who go missing every year. That’s more than 1,600 a day, many of them children, and 40% of the missing are people of color though Black Americans make up 13% of the population. There are more than 270 South Carolinians currently missing, and the year has just begun. It’s an American crisis that affects us all. I will fight for all missing Americans.

In conclusion, as a member of Congress, I would be committed to addressing the challenges facing our nation. I believe that by working together, we can find solutions that will benefit all Americans. We must build our nation from within to be competitive and secure on the international stage.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: As children, many of us were taught by the dairy industry, which dumped millions into our education system, that its products were essential for daily consumption. This propaganda was successful, and we now consume more dairy products than ever. Climate change is real and affects South Carolina’s coastal regions and other areas.

Education is critical in understanding how our lifestyle choices and technological advancements impact the planet. We need to invest in education and awareness, as people can only support what they understand. By creating new majors and subjects in schools and colleges, we can prepare for a future that is less reliant on fossil fuels, and build an industry that will provide jobs for generations to come. Although change takes time, these efforts will set us on the right path.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: The issue of immigration has been a persistent problem for our country. Despite multiple attempts by Congress to address it, there have been no long-term solutions. One of the major hindrances to finding a solution is the partisan divide. Additionally, personal feelings often cloud commonsense proposals to the problem, which is a misguided approach to policy. To find solutions for our immigration policies, we must change our attitudes and focus on what works.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: The abortion issue has gripped the nation in debate. Since there are a lot of factors involved in what should or should not be the legality of abortion, a narrow approach is not a feasible solution. Circumstances on abortion differ on the medical needs of a patient, so those needs should be under the discretion of a doctor and the mother who’s carrying the child. I don’t believe that Congress should be in the business of making medical, spiritual or religious decisions for Americans. Programs and education for alternative approaches should be explored.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and their aftermath?

A: I can view the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in one way: an attack on our country and way of life. As a combat soldier who joined the Army at the height of 9/11, I feel a responsibility to uphold my duty and responsibility to this country, which I swore to do when I raised my right hand. At Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS), I was sworn into the U.S. Army to defend our Constitution and our country against foreign and domestic enemies. I will continue to defend our Constitution and our way of life.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponent in this election?

A: Over the course of several years, communities in the second congressional district of South Carolina have experienced unequal representation. Certain communities have witnessed little to no growth, while others have experienced moderate growth. The lack of equal representation has been identified as a significant hindrance to the district’s economic growth, which necessitates immediate attention. Given that District 2 serves as a link to every community, it is imperative that every link in the chain be strong to ensure the chain’s overall strength. Consequently, I will focus on repairing the broken chain by investing in the working and middle class. It is essential to ensure that individuals in these classes receive livable wages, and there should be no more excuses as to why the minimum wage cannot be raised. Furthermore, infrastructure is another critical area that requires attention. Example: There is no justification for our roads’ poor condition compared to other regions. It is crucial to ensure that federal aid reaches all communities, particularly those that need it the most. Education is also a top priority, given that South Carolina ranks among the least educated populations. It is necessary to prioritize our schools and programs to keep pace with rising technological trends. Additionally, we must invest in small businesses and offer incentives and grants to members of communities of color to conduct business within their community. This approach guarantees that the money remains within the community, promoting growth. Ultimately, a thriving economy depends on everyone’s success.

Incumbent U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: My top priorities are to create jobs, reduce inflation and help democracies defeat dictators. I support policies to reduce inflation, while President Joe Biden’s policies of spend, borrow and tax have produced a 40-year high. The average family has been assaulted with Biden creating a 19 percent reduction in the value of family income being nearly an additional annual cost increase of $12,000 for basics of groceries, housing and energy.

I have a lifetime record of working for creating jobs with local Chambers of Commerce and serving on the State Development Board (now Commerce Department) for Michelin in Lexington with Gov. Jim Edwards, state Senate job initiatives for BMW and UPS with Gov. Carroll Campbell, and now in Congress supporting President Donald Trump with tax cuts creating jobs while supporting Gov. Nikki Haley to create 8,000 jobs at Boeing with suppliers in the Midlands gaining hundreds of jobs.

International policy is Democracies Defeat Dictators with Peace Through Strength as achieved by Ronald Reagan. President Trump helped rebuild our military. In the Middle East, I led the congressional delegation to open for the Trump decision the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem leading to the Abraham Accords. To stop war criminal Vladimir Putin, I supported the Trump initiatives of Javelin missiles to Ukraine, U.S. troops in Poland, and stopping Nord Stream 2 financing of Putin.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: I want America to achieve energy independence without subsidies. President Joe Biden’s energy policies destroy jobs as on his first day he stopped the Keystone Pipeline, which was facilitated by Michelin tires made in Lexington for shale recovery.

Ever since, Biden’s 2022 cannibalizing of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, 2024 stopping of liquified natural gas exports and recent smothering of energy development in Alaska have put American families at risk. Since Biden took office, we’ve seen the price of gas more than double due to his extremist policies.

Biden is forcing dependency on energy sources controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. His shortsighted policies can be replaced by all of the above energy with the free market, not government subsidies for politically well-connected insiders.

President Donald Trump established energy independence so important for lower prices and national security. America can replace war criminal Putin sales to Central and Eastern Europe stopping intimidation by Putin as he invades with mass murder across Ukraine threatening Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, Estonia and Poland.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: We need to enforce the existing laws.

As a former immigration attorney, I saw firsthand the positive laws we have as I promoted legal immigrants to achieve the American Dream of opportunity.

We do not need new laws or to change laws except to stop Biden from subverting laws we have. His executive orders and gruesome failures to enforce existing law has every American at risk of attack as we sadly saw with the killing of Laken Riley.

Opening the borders to known terrorists is insane. Three years ago, as I visited Del Rio, Texas, Border Patrol agents were not able to acknowledge crossings, but now we know hundreds on the terrorist watchlist have been discovered at the southern border. Now tens of thousands of military age young men and women from dictator countries have crossed as illegal aliens with more 9/11 attacks likely, if not imminent, on American families as warned repeatedly by the FBI.

Legal immigrants are a blessing for America, but illegal aliens are criminals who should be deported.

Editor’s note: McClatchy’s South Carolina opinon team has a policy to refer to people who cross the border illegally as undocumented immigrants, avoiding words like “illegal” to describe them. We make rare exceptions for direct quotes or official documents. Rep. Joe Wilson’s description was published as submitted after he was offered the opportunity to change it and declined.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: I will always fight for a strong pro-life agenda to protect the unborn.

Abortion is a state issue and I commend Gov. Henry McMaster with the South Carolina General Assembly for addressing the matter in accordance with public input.

I am pro-life with the state law provisions. Sadly, the Democratic Party has adopted the extremist acceptance of infanticide with killing the baby up to birth.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and their aftermath?

A: The events of Jan. 6 showed irresponsible conduct without adequate Capitol security.

The mob action of Jan. 6 is inexcusable and the lack of security at the U.S. Capitol that day is unexplainable. President Donald Trump requested additional Capitol security, but Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was responsible for Capitol security, did not act. Having been in the Capitol that day I knew security should have been reinforced and bizarre threats were not foreseen or taken seriously.There are cases of weaponization by the federal government for some arrested in connection with Jan. 6. All tapes of the day should be released and if any government intelligence personnel failed to act, they should be identified.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponent in this election?

A: I stand for limited government, expanded freedom and a strong national security.

President Donald Trump’s endorsement of my record of public service promoting successfully jobs across South Carolina is meaningful.

I am dedicated to limited government and expanded freedom and national security as evidenced by my voting record. Ever-growing government must be challenged to promote citizens having power for their own lives without government officials being all-powerful.

As a 31-year Army veteran myself with four sons who have served in the military in Iraq, Egypt and Afghanistan, I will fight for Peace Through Strength.

Just as Ronald Reagan achieved victory over communism, I know America with its allies will defeat dictators of rule of gun invading democracies of rule of law. Sadly, Biden appeasement in Afghanistan continues the global war on terrorism from the safe haven of Afghanistan to American neighborhoods with attacks likely, if not imminent, across America as warned by the FBI.

I am optimistic for the future of America, having faith in the American people to stand for freedom with the principles of our Constitution.

Congressional District 3: Alliance Party’s Bedenbaugh vs. Democrat Best vs. Republican Biggs

Mike Bedenbaugh

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: My top 10 policies in my book “Reviving Our Republic: 95 Theses for the Future of America” are:

• A candidate for political office should only accept campaign funds from individual citizens qualified to vote for them.
• Elected members of Congress must not partake in a retirement plan and should receive Social Security like the rest of us.
• The president cannot send military troops into a foreign nation without a formal declaration of war.
• A candidate for political office should be limited to how many years they can serve to ensure the public benefit is not compromised by the power accumulated for their self-benefit.
• Our nation’s foreign policy initiatives must never be determined by profit-driven corporations.
• End the practice of omnibus bills: Any bill must pertain to one subject only, and that subject should be in the title.
• No elected official can leave elected office and work in any “position of influence” (board of trustees or be employed as a lobbyist) with a 501(c)(4) for a period equal to his/her time in office.
• Any elected official must place any stocks they own in a blind trust and cannot buy or sell stocks while in office.
• Create a time-definable plan to pay off a majority percentage of the debt of the federal government.
• Establishment of, and rigid enforcement of, antitrust laws in both the state and national marketplace with a prioritized focus on media and medical conglomerates.

The two most pressing matters: Stay out of foreign entanglements and secure the border.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: Balancing climate action with economic and energy concerns while maintaining America’s position in fossil fuel markets requires a pragmatic approach. It’s essential to ensure that the free market supports a diverse energy portfolio. While private equity invests in renewable energy, it’s prudent to continue leveraging domestic fossil fuel resources efficiently. Advanced technologies, such as carbon capture and storage, can reduce emissions from fossil fuels, ensuring they remain viable while addressing environmental concerns.

The federal government should trust the free market to reward efficiency and avoid intervening to protect politically favored industries or minimize those deemed unfavorable. Tax policies should foster innovation without stifling traditional energy sectors, allowing the fossil fuel industry to thrive as long as it remains competitive.

Economic policies must focus on maintaining a level playing field for all American industries. This means resisting excessive regulations or trade agreements that disadvantage domestic fossil fuel producers. Additionally, the federal government should respect federalism by not overriding local zoning or land use laws regarding industry permitting. Citizens and their local representatives, whether state, county or municipality, are often best positioned to make decisions that align with community needs and localized environmental considerations.

By adopting a market-driven approach that supports technological advancements, respects local governance and maintains economic fairness, America can preserve its edge in fossil fuels while advancing towards a more sustainable future.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: To address the urgent need for labor while creating a more humane and orderly immigration system, I propose several significant changes to current U.S. immigration policy. Recognizing that immigrants fill critical labor shortages, particularly in sectors that many Americans are less inclined to work in, we must develop a system that values their contributions. Regarding immigrants coming in through our southern border illegally, we should temporarily close the border to any person until a robust system is in place that will allow for the establishment of vetting centers in every Central and South American capital and Mexico. These centers would process applications within 30 days, enabling individuals to apply for entry without leaving their country, reducing the risks associated with unauthorized border crossings.

To complement this, we must implement a fostering system within the U.S. that ensures immigrants have access to employment and secure housing in their destination communities, supporting both their integration and economic participation. Furthermore, the U.S. military should collaborate with foreign governments to dismantle the criminal cartels profiting from human trafficking and illicit drug trade.

A pathway to legal residency should be established for immigrants who entered illegally with minor children in school but are fully employed and contributing to the economy. However, any productive, working adults who initially entered illegally should never become full-fledged citizens without some form of extraordinary service to the country such as honorable military service. This approach balances the need for security, economic growth and fair treatment of those who have demonstrated commitment and contribution to their new country.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: As a constitutional conservative, I firmly believe in the wisdom of the 10th Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states and the people. This principle reflects the Founders’ intent to limit federal overreach and respect state sovereignty. As a candidate for Congress representing South Carolina’s 3rd District, I will honor this constitutional boundary and reject any call for federal intervention in matters that rightly fall under state jurisdiction. I oppose any attempt to impose a constitutional amendment banning medical procedures or diagnoses that would intrude upon the relationship between a patient, a trained and licensed medical professional, and state law. Federal intrusion into these areas not only violates the 10th Amendment but also undermines the fundamental principles of federalism that have kept our republic balanced and free. Decisions on all issues of health care should be made at the state level, where local officials are best equipped to understand and meet the needs of their communities. As your representative, I will uphold these constitutional principles and advocate for a limited federal government that respects the autonomy of states and the rights of individuals.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: The Jan. 6 Capitol riot stands as a terrible blight on our national honor, a stark reminder of the fragility of our representative republic. As a nation founded on the principles of law and order, the violent storming of the Capitol by a mob seeking to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power was a direct attack on the very foundation of our democracy. The United States has long prided itself on being a nation of laws, where disputes are settled through legal means and not through force. Mob violence, as witnessed on Jan. 6, cannot be abided, for it undermines the core values that bind us together as a free and just society. South Carolina history offers us a potent example of a similar situation, even in the face of passionate political dissent. In 1876, during the most contentious elections in American, and especially, South Carolina’s history, Wade Hampton demonstrated remarkable leadership when he led the dissenting faction challenging the election. Hampton intervened when his supporters, angered by perceived electoral injustices, planned to storm the Statehouse and possibly ignite a horrible race-based bloodbath and another civil war. His refusal to allow mob violence protected the fragile peace and ultimately helped restore order in one of our nation’s most tumultuous times. The lessons from Jan. 6, and from Hampton’s actions in 1876, are clear: We must reaffirm our commitment to the rule of law and reject any form of mob rule. Our national honor, and individual liberty, depends on it.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponents in this election?

A: As a constitutional conservative who believes deeply in the principles of liberal democracy, I offer a distinct choice for Congress that is guided by the vision laid out in my book, “Reviving Our Republic: 95 Theses for the Future of America.” This work presents a comprehensive plan for restoring our nation’s foundational values and securing a future that upholds the rights and freedoms of every citizen. Unlike Sheri Biggs and Bryon Best, who must surrender their personal sovereignty to align with national party agendas, I remain fiercely independent and yield no sovereignty to any corporatized party leadership headquartered in Washington.

My commitment is to the Constitution and the betterment of more than 750,000 constituents in South Carolina’s 3rd District. My book’s proposals focus on reforming our electoral system to ensure fair representation, curbing nationalized corporate influence on policy while strengthening individual liberty, restoring the balance between federal and state powers, and implementing methods to ensure fiscal responsibility and address the national debt. These are the foundational pillars of a renewed republic, and they drive my candidacy forward. While Biggs and Best are tied to their out-of-state party leadership, often prioritizing national agendas over local concerns, I stand free to advance a vision that truly serves our district and its people. Guided by the foundational principles in my book, I will work with the president and congressional leadership as long as they respect the Constitution and protect the individual liberties of South Carolinians.

Bryon Best

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: Top domestic: education reform in South Carolina. We are ranked 42nd in the nation in education. Improved education systems lead to a better-trained workforce. Educational reform can create a more qualified labor pool, making South Carolina more attractive to businesses considering relocation or expansion.

Top international: climate change and its global impacts. This issue encompasses environmental degradation, rising sea levels, extreme weather events and their implications for national security and public health. Congress plays a crucial role in shaping U.S. foreign policy and international agreements related to climate action, as well as investing in sustainable energy solutions.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: I would attack the changing climate by incentivizing sustainable practices by offering tax incentives or subsidies. Businesses and consumers who adopt those practices can encourage a widespread participation in the green economy.

I also would support green technology innovation by investing in research and development of new technologies that can lead to breakthroughs in carbon capture, battery storage and sustainable agriculture, driving both economic growth and environmental protection.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: I would change the immigration policy by addressing the root cause of migration. Engage in foreign policy initiatives that address the root causes of migration, such as poverty, violence and political instability in home countries to reduce the pressure for individuals to migrate. I would change the policy by strengthening border security with technology. Invest in modern technology for border security that balances the safety with humane treatment of migrants, ensuring that enforcement does not lead to human rights abuse.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: In all aspects, I am pro-women. I don’t believe the federal government or any man should be telling a woman what to do with the autonomy of their bodies.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: By no means do I condone the actions of the American citizens who participated in the riot of Jan. 6. 2021. We as Americans all want what’s best for this country. Furthermore, we have to respect our laws and to govern our democracy. We may not all agree about the decisions made by the leadership of this nation, but we are all taught at a young age to govern emotions with self-control.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponent/s in this election?

A: South Carolina deserves better. For far too long, we’ve been ranked near the bottom in key areas that define a state’s success. We are currently 42nd in education, 42nd in opportunity and 37th in infrastructure in U.S. News and World Report’s 2024 state rankings, and listed as one of the top 10 poorest states in the country when it comes to median income. These numbers reflect decades of failed leadership under a single-party system.

It’s time for a change. Our state needs fresh, young and progressive leadership that can elevate South Carolina to new heights of economic growth and prosperity. Electing me means bringing back a trusted voice that genuinely values the concerns and aspirations of the citizens in District 3. Together, we can build a future where opportunity, education and infrastructure drive our state forward. Let’s create a South Carolina that works for everyone.

Sheri Biggs

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: As your member of Congress, my top domestic priority will be securing our borders to ensure the safety and sovereignty of our nation. The border crisis is a critical challenge that affects every American, from our economy to our security. We must build the wall, stop the flow of illegal aliens and drugs, and replace “catch-and-release” with “stop-and-deport.” This issue has been exacerbated by the current administration’s failure to provide strong leadership, and I am committed to addressing this head-on. As someone who has seen the importance of secure borders firsthand while deployed in the Middle East, I understand that a country without borders is a country with no order.

Internationally, my top priority will be restoring America’s energy independence. Under President Donald Trump, we achieved remarkable energy dominance, but the current administration’s policies have reversed these gains, making us more reliant on foreign energy sources and compromising our national security. We need to reopen pipelines, reduce regulations on domestic energy production, and invest in American energy innovation. Energy independence not only strengthens our economy by creating jobs and lowering costs for consumers but also ensures that we are not vulnerable to foreign influence or energy blackmail.

By focusing on these priorities, we can strengthen our nation both at home and abroad, ensuring a safer, more prosperous future for all Americans.

Editor’s note: McClatchy’s South Carolina opinion team has a policy to refer to people who cross the border illegally as undocumented immigrants, avoiding words like “illegal” to describe them. We make rare exceptions for direct quotes or official documents. Sheri Biggs’s description was published as submitted after she was offered the opportunity to change it and declined.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: As your member of Congress, I will prioritize policies that protect American jobs and industries while maintaining our energy independence and environmental stewardship.

I believe in a robust energy portfolio that includes traditional sources like oil, natural gas, coal and nuclear power. These industries are the backbone of our economy, providing jobs and ensuring affordable energy. We must support these industries by reducing unnecessary regulations. Nuclear power is crucial for South Carolina’s energy grid, and I am thankful for the Oconee Nuclear Station’s contribution.

I support practical environmental policies that focus on clean air and water without succumbing to the alarmist climate change agenda. Energy efficiency and responsible resource management can provide environmental benefits without imposing burdensome costs on our economy.

America needs an all-of-the-above energy approach. However, the Biden administration’s favoritism in energy markets, especially in the oil and gas industry, has hurt Americans who are tired of paying more at the pump and for air conditioning. Utilizing our own resources is essential for energy security and independence.

South Carolina’s growing population requires a reliable energy supply for families and industries. I look forward to advancing pro-America, pro-energy policies in Washington.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: I will prioritize comprehensive immigration reform to secure our borders, protect American jobs, and uphold the rule of law. The current immigration system is broken and undermines our national security and economic stability.

Here are the key changes I propose:

Firstly, we must secure our borders by completing the wall and enhancing border security measures. This includes increasing the number of border patrol agents, utilizing advanced technology, and ensuring that those who enter our country do so legally. A strong border is essential to maintaining our sovereignty and safety.

Secondly, we need to end policies that encourage illegal immigration. I will push for the elimination of “catch-and-release” and replace it with a “stop-and-deport” policy. Those who enter our country illegally must be swiftly returned to their home countries to deter further illegal crossings.

Thirdly, we must reform our legal immigration system to prioritize merit-based entry. This means welcoming individuals who follow the rules and who can contribute to our economy and society, while also protecting American workers from unfair competition.

By focusing on skills and merit, we can ensure that our immigration system serves the best interests of the United States.

Finally, I will advocate for strict enforcement of immigration laws within our borders. This includes cracking down on sanctuary cities, ensuring that employers verify the legal status of their workers, and holding accountable those who violate immigration laws.

By implementing these changes, we can restore order to our immigration system, protect American jobs, and enhance our national security.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: As a staunch pro-life advocate, I believe that every life is precious and must be protected from the moment of conception. My stance is rooted in my deep Christian faith and the belief that all life is made in the image and likeness of God. Therefore, I am firmly against abortion except in the rarest and most extreme circumstances when the life of the mother is in immediate and severe danger and all other medical options have been exhausted.

This is a tragic and rare situation, but one where the primary goal must be to save lives whenever possible. In such cases, medical professionals should work to preserve both the mother and the unborn child if at all feasible.

In any other circumstance, I do not support abortion at any stage of pregnancy. Late-term abortions, in particular, are especially egregious as they involve viable infants who can survive outside the womb with medical assistance. Our society must uphold the sanctity of life and provide support for women facing unplanned pregnancies through counseling, health care, and adoption services.

By fostering a culture that values life and offers compassionate support to mothers, we can ensure that every child has the opportunity to be born and thrive. My commitment to protecting the unborn is unwavering, and I will always stand up for the rights of the most vulnerable among us.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: The events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, were deeply troubling and unacceptable. As a strong believer in law and order, I condemn any form of violence and illegal activity. The actions of those who violently breached the Capitol were wrong and do not represent the values of the vast majority of conservatives who believe in peaceful protest and respect for our institutions.

However, I also believe it is important to consider the broader context and the concerns of millions of Americans who feel disenfranchised and distrustful of the electoral process. The right to free speech and peaceful assembly is fundamental, and the frustrations expressed by many on Jan. 6 reflect a profound disillusionment with the government and media.

It is crucial that we address these concerns constructively. We need to ensure transparency and integrity in our elections to restore faith in our democratic system. This means implementing measures such as voter ID laws, ensuring accurate voter rolls, and safeguarding the voting process from fraud and irregularities.

Additionally, the treatment of individuals involved in the Jan. 6 events should be fair and just, with respect for their legal rights. There should be no double standards in how we enforce the law based on political beliefs.

Moving forward, we must unite as a nation on our constitutional principles, uphold the rule of law, and work together to address the issues that divide us.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponents in this election?

A: I humbly ask that voters put their trust and vote in me to represent them in Congress because I offer a unique combination of experience, proven leadership and a commitment to conservative principles that sets me apart from my opponents. As a lieutenant colonel in the Air National Guard, a board-certified family and psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner and licensed nursing home administrator, I have dedicated my life to serving our country and our community. Additionally, I have a degree in Christian ministries and have a strong faith coalition supporting my campaign. My military, health-care and ministry backgrounds provide me with a deep understanding of critical issues from national security to health-care reform.

My service in the military has taught me the importance of discipline, strategic thinking and unwavering commitment to duty and honor. These are qualities that I will bring to Congress to effectively address the challenges we face, such as securing our borders, strengthening our economy and protecting our constitutional rights. My extensive work in health care has given me firsthand insight into the struggles many Americans face regarding access to quality medical care. I have a clear plan to address these issues by promoting free-market solutions that increase competition and lower costs without compromising quality of care.

Voters deserve a representative who shares their values, with skills, integrity and experience. I am that candidate. I am ready to fight for the interests of South Carolina’s Third Congressional District with dedication and a proven track record of service.

Congressional District 4: Constitution Party’s Hackett vs. Democrat Harvey vs. Republican Timmons

Mark Hackett

Hackett did not provide a photo.

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: Stop the invasion of illegal aliens. End involvement in the pointless undeclared no-win wars in Europe and the Middle East. Bring down the debt by defunding the Secret Service, FBI and CIA.

Editor’s note: McClatchy’s South Carolina opinion team has a policy to refer to people who cross the border illegally as undocumented immigrants, avoiding words like “illegal” to describe them. We make rare exceptions for direct quotes or official documents. Mark Hackett’s description was published as submitted after he was offered the opportunity to change it and declined.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: Climate change is in God’s hands. Americans should take advantage of all sources of energy without federal interference.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: The states should start deporting illegals to their countries of origin.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: The 10th amendment to the Constitution gives the states the authority to regulate abortion.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: Those still in jail should be pardoned.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponents in this election?

A: There’s hardly a dime’s worth of difference between the two major parties. Both support big debt and endless wars. It’s time to go Constitution Party.

Kathryn Harvey

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: As a small business owner in Spartanburg County, my top domestic priority is strengthening our economy, championing smart growth and bringing down the cost of groceries and gas for folks in South Carolina’s 4th Congressional District. We need to make the American Dream more affordable here in the Upstate by lifting up our working families. In Washington, I’ll fight to foster an economy where everyone has a fair shot at success. That starts with good-paying jobs, accessible health care, and quality education.

My opponent, Rep. William Timmons, has done nothing to bring down everyday costs during his three terms in Congress. He voted against preventing big oil and gas companies from price gouging consumers at the pump. He voted against expanding the Child Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit. And now, he wants to raise the retirement age and cut Social Security by $1.5 trillion. His policies have hurt working families; I want to fight for them.

My international priorities are informed by my professional experience working at the highest levels of the nonprofit sector, helping lead the international nonprofit behind “Sesame Street.” In this role, I addressed some of the toughest challenges facing children here at home and abroad, including public health and early education outcomes in India, sub-Saharan Africa and refugee camps around the world. In Congress, I’ll continue to advocate on behalf of these kids and families, especially those in conflict zones like Ukraine and countries where democracy and human rights are under threat.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: I believe efforts to fight climate change are not mutually exclusive with policy measures to help strengthen our economy and meet our increased demand for energy in South Carolina.

Let me explain: The Upstate is one of the fastest-growing regions in the country, with populations in Greenville and Spartanburg Counties that are expected to increase by 27% and 49%, respectively, by 2042. Our next representative must ensure the tens of thousands of working families who will move here in the coming decades are set up for success, and that includes meeting increased residential energy demands.

South Carolina — which has no fossil fuel reserves and consumes more than double the amount of energy it produces — must accelerate its embrace of alternative forms of energy, including clean and renewable energy sources that will result in reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Combating climate change also means making existing energy infrastructure more resilient against extreme weather events. When our power plants and electric grid are less vulnerable to hurricanes and tropical storms, the Upstate’s working families will be able to keep the lights on for longer.

These are complicated, interconnected issues that William Timmons has shown little interest in tackling. Look no further than his vote against the Inflation Reduction Act, a historic piece of climate legislation that brought down energy costs and created good-paying clean energy jobs in South Carolina. Unlike Timmons, I’ll fight for affordable, reliable and sustainable streams of energy to power the everyday lives of the Upstate’s working families.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: When it comes to our southern border, I’ll never put party loyalty over our national security. You can’t say the same about William Timmons.

In Congress, I’ll vote for the Senate’s comprehensive border security package, negotiated by one of the most conservative Senate Republicans and endorsed by the National Border Patrol Council.

Earlier this year, extreme House Republicans like Timmons killed the Senate’s bipartisan border deal because Donald Trump told them it would hurt his chances of winning back the White House. I believe that’s wrong, and I’d vote for the Senate’s border bill on Day One in office.

You can count on me to strengthen and secure our southern border. I support increasing the number of Border Patrol personnel, asylum officers and detention beds. I also support increased funding for additional immigration judges, as well as efforts to combat the trafficking of fentanyl.

I believe our nation’s diversity is its strength, but I also believe in law and order. We must take serious action to create an orderly, humane system that allows hardworking immigrants who waited in line to enter the United States legally and safely.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: I’m running for Congress to defend your freedoms and protect reproductive health care for the Upstate’s women and families. Unlike William Timmons, who has called for a nationwide abortion ban and co-sponsored legislation that threatens IVF access, I believe politicians have no place in the doctor’s office. Period.

You have the right to make medical decisions about your own body, and you should be free to grow your family with the help of fertility treatments. Women and parents in South Carolina should never have to get on a plane and fly to another state to receive the critical health care they need.

In Congress, I’ll vote to enshrine your right to reproductive health care and safeguard access to birth control and IVF. When it comes to limits on abortion, my position is simple: I support codifying the holdings of Roe v. Wade, which established a trimester framework to regulate the procedure that accounted for the government’s interest in protecting both women’s health and prenatal life.

I understand this is a profoundly sensitive issue, and the decision to terminate a pregnancy is a deeply personal and painful one for countless women across South Carolina. William Timmons seeks to minimize their trauma by spreading lies about post-birth abortion, which is illegal in every single state.

Here’s the truth: Reproductive health care is on the ballot in this election. And if Timmons wins another term in Congress, he will vote to enact a nationwide abortion ban, just like he promised.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: The events of Jan. 6, 2021, were nothing short of an attack on American democracy. Violent rioters injured over 140 police officers — and several later died. Rioters’ actions caused more than $2.8 million in damage to the Capitol building and costs to the U.S. Capitol Police.

This mob was incited to action by extreme politicians like William Timmons, who knowingly spread lies about the outcome of the 2020 election — fanning flames of division in the weeks before Jan. 6 and endangering the foundations of our democracy. Timmons knew the truth: More than 60 lawsuits challenging the election results had failed in state and federal courts, and even high-ranking Trump administration officials declared the election to be fair and secure.

Nevertheless, Timmons remained dead-set on overturning the results of the election and denying the will of the American people. When Congress reconvened just hours after the riot, Timmons was one of the House Republicans who still voted to object to the certification of the Electoral College results. Once again, he put party loyalty over our democracy and national security.

William Timmons has proven he is an extreme, anti-freedom politician bent on ripping away your personal liberties and basic rights. On Jan. 6, Timmons attacked Americans’ constitutional right to have their vote counted — and now, he continues to attack women’s right to access critical reproductive health care. Unlike Timmons, you can count on me to enforce law and order and defend the Constitution.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponents in this election?

A: The Upstate is one of the fastest-growing regions in the country. We’re attracting young, working families from all across America — and we’re primed for an explosion of growth over the coming years. But in order to seize this incredible moment for the Upstate’s economy and people, we’ve got to have the right leadership in Washington. Our current representative, William Timmons, is doing everything he can to slow our economic growth and discourage folks from moving here to start their families.

Time and again, Timmons has turned down billions of dollars of federal investment for our state, putting petty politics above the needs of his constituents. Meanwhile, he has embraced the most extreme policies imaginable — even voting against expanding health care benefits for veterans exposed to burn pits in the line of duty. And don’t get me started on reproductive freedom: In this majority-female district, Timmons co-sponsored a bill that threatens access to IVF, and he has called for a national abortion ban.

I’m committed to ensuring that our district doesn’t just survive under William Timmons, but that it thrives under the commonsense servant leadership I’ll bring to Congress. As the daughter of special education teachers and a small business owner, I care about our kids and families, and I show up in our communities. As your next representative, you can count on me to defend your freedoms, champion smart growth, invest in our small businesses and prepare the Upstate’s working families for long-term success.

Incumbent U.S. Rep. William Timmons

Timmons did not reply to our survey.

Congressional District 5: Democrat Hundley vs. Republican Norman

Evangeline Hundley

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: As an elected congressional official to the U.S. House of Representatives, I want to help lower the cost of living for my constituents by stopping price gouging, ensuring affordable housing, providing health care for all, lowering prescription costs, making public higher education freely available, ensuring universal pre-K happens, and making the childcare tax credit permanent.

Our biggest international threats right now are Russia, China, Iran and North Korea. I will support all efforts to keep Russia from taking Ukraine, and I support Ukraine to be a part of NATO. We must continue to work for peace in the Middle East, recognizing that all people deserve to live without the fear of death and an attack every day. And we must also fight against the misinformation that is being spread by all these foreign nations into our own country.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: Right now, America is producing more oil than any other country, yet we know our dependence on fossil fuels is the greatest contributor to green gas emissions. This is hurting our entire ecosystems and for us to do something about it is called survival. As your next U.S. congresswoman, I will work hard to make sure that South Carolina is on the forefront of the climate protection revolution by creating great paying green jobs and bringing safer and cleaner manufacturing plants to our state. Cleaner energy production is good for our health, our livelihoods and our planet.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: From my work in the construction industry, I have witnessed firsthand how immigrants make invaluable contributions to our workforce, economy and society. To address the inefficiencies and problems in our immigration system, I support five main steps to streamline the process for citizenship while maintaining national security and border control, the first being a clear path to citizenship for the 11 million-plus undocumented immigrants. I support increasing the number of attorneys and judges involved in the immigration process to reduce backlogs. I support increasing the number of border patrol agents to help with the shortage of agents. I support increasing the annual visa cap for victims of trafficking and violence, expanding our asylum system to ensure fair and accessible practices for those seeking refuge. And finally, I support the use of technology and drones to prevent the flow of fentanyl into our country.

It is worth noting two things concerning the subject of immigration. All the things I will support were in the Senate bill that the House of Representatives did not take up in obedience to former President Donanld Trump. And right now, the border crossings are at their lowest levels since February 2021 due to the cap of 2,500 per day that President Joe Biden put into place.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: We must stop publicly litigating the rights of women’s bodily autonomy. I am personally sick and tired of this same ole GOP-led divisive issue. It’s simple, all women must be given access to great health care so that babies who are born are healthy and strong long past birth and throughout life. No woman should be forced to carry a baby in an at-risk pregnancy where the life of a mother is at risk. There is not a doctor in this country who will birth a baby after 9 months and then kill it. That is called murder, and it is against the law.

I’ll make sure that all women in America have the right to bodily autonomy by co-sponsoring legislation to codify Roe v Wade into the law of the land, vote to pass the Ensuring Women’s Right to Reproductive Freedom Act and the Equal Rights Amendment Act, and vote to overturn The Comstock Act of 1873.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: In 245 years in the life of this democracy, we had always passed power peacefully. Until Jan. 6, 2021. When the GOP in Congress helped the last president damage the central tenet of our democracy — the peaceful transfer of power — THEY put democracy on the ballot in this election. Democracy has always been central to our republic, even when wealthy people or political parties tried to diminish it. We must save the legacy of this democracy for the next generation. Let us pass on the democracy intended by those who wrote our Constitution and do it peacefully.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponent in this election?

A: There are at least three great reasons to vote for me over my opponent, Ralph Norman.

1) I will always respect the will of the voters in a free and fair election, but my opponent called for “Marshall Law” (i.e. martial law) to overturn our 2020 election and he voted not to certify an election that he, himself, was in.

2) I will always protect the privacy of a woman and a man, but my opponent sponsored the “Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act.” This legislation is a total and complete invasion of a woman’s privacy.

3) I will always vote yes to bring home good paying jobs, to improve our roads and bridges, to manufacture chips in America, to lower inflation costs, and to give lifesaving help to our veterans, but my opponent voted NO on the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act and the Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act, all of which we needed to improve our lives, our state, and our country.

It’s now or never … democracy must prevail — for our children, for the world. And I will always fight through my vote to keep it and protect it for us all.

Incumbent U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: If there could be only one top domestic policy, as this question directs, then we must start with fiscal sanity in Washington. It is not hyperbole to say our nation is quickly heading for financial ruin, and dark days are ahead without dramatic changes to fiscal policy. We desperately need to reduce runaway, out-of-control federal spending, balance the budget, and start paying down this crippling national debt. For decades, politicians on both sides of the aisle have created this crisis, and it can no longer be solved by simply raising taxes.

Internationally, our foreign policy under the Biden-Harris administration is a complete train wreck, from its horribly botched withdrawal from Afghanistan to the rise in state-sponsored terrorism from adversaries like Iran. Separately, the administration continues to throw shade on Israel’s right to defend itself. Meanwhile, Russia has invaded Ukraine, and China is preparing to advance on Taiwan. All of these are high priorities. As such, the answer to this question must simply be a basic restoration of America’s strength and influence abroad. While I’m staunchly opposed to endless wars that don’t affect our people, there’s no question the world is a more peaceful place when America has a strong voice on the international stage. Not surprisingly, we’ve fallen off that stage under this inept administration.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: What I oppose are policies that call for sweeping changes to our economy and way of life in some vague, ill-defined effort to combat climate change. There’s no shortage of radical, left-wing proposals like the so-called “Green New Deal,” which my opponent supports, that would quickly devastate our nation if enacted. I’ve yet to see rational, fact-based projections for what any of these extreme measures would truly cost our nation in terms of increased taxes, lost jobs, restrictions on our liberties, decreased prosperity, etc. because it’s simply not possible to predict. Jumping off a cliff and hoping for a successful landing is a fool’s way to manage our energy and climate policies.

Yes, we need to safely pursue alternative energy sources, but those sources are nowhere close to being able to meet our energy needs yet. Until such time as they are, we must embrace an “all of the above” energy strategy. Fossil, nuclear, solar, wind, hydro, and everything in between.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: Let’s start with a review. When Joe Biden and Kamala Harris came into office, they immediately stopped new border wall construction, tried to place a moratorium on the removal of illegal immigrants with active deportation orders, tried to end Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” asylum policy, and reinstated the policy to release detainees into the interior of the United States while awaiting their hearings.

So, ask yourself: Why on earth would the Biden-Harris administration deliberately enact policies that encourage and facilitate rampant illegal immigration? The result was predictable. There have been roughly 10 million apprehensions of illegal immigrants since 2021, and many of those have been released on their own recognizance into the United States. Those are just the ones we know about, as countless others have made it through undetected. All this while Democrats in Congress have pursued multiple avenues seeking to grant amnesty to those who have entered our country illegally! This is no coincidence, and it doesn’t take much to connect the dots on Democrats’ motives here.

From crime to the massive strain on our social systems, illegal immigration would not be the crisis it is today had Biden and Harris simply left the border policies Donald Trump had implemented in place. Therefore, to answer the question, we ought to start by undoing every policy the Biden-Harris administration took to create its massive wave of illegal immigration.

Editor’s note: McClatchy’s South Carolina opinion team has a policy to refer to people who cross the border illegally as undocumented immigrants, avoiding words like “illegal” to describe them. We make rare exceptions for direct quotes or official documents. Rep. Ralph Norman’s description was published as submitted after he was offered the opportunity to change it and declined.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: I’ll answer it this way, as a Christian, parent and grandparent: It tears at my soul to think about abortion being used as a method of after-the-fact birth control. In other words, the scraping of a living child out of her mother’s womb because that child is unwanted or inconvenient.

I believe there must be considerations for those heartbreaking situations when the life or health of the mother is in jeopardy, and also when the mother is a victim of horrible crimes like rape or incest. However, with respect to abortion for the sake of convenience, that is not “health care,” and I fear for a society that elevates so-called “reproductive rights” above the actual right to life itself.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: I think Americans who are accused of any criminal activity ought not to be subject to undue delays in their right to a fair trial. Meanwhile, I remain significantly more concerned about the ongoing damage liberalism is doing to this nation than any single event that occurred almost four years ago.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponent in this election?

A: For starters, my opponent is calling for universal health care. While there are certainly ways to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs, the total government takeover of all health care for which she advocates would be an unmitigated disaster.

She believes “descendants of the black people who were enslaved in America deserve reparations.” Almost 160 years after the abolition of slavery in the United States, I cannot imagine a more divisive action than to take money from people today, who have never owned slaves, and give it to others based on their skin color, who themselves have never been enslaved.

Speaking of income redistribution, my opponent wants forgiveness of student loan debt. What she’s really talking about is transferring those loans from people who borrowed the money — and received that education — to those who did not: you, the taxpayer.

My opponent wants to abolish the Electoral College. With all due respect, she would vote to eliminate a critical protection for South Carolina voters and enable densely populated liberal states to easily impose their values on us. This would minimize South Carolina on a national level, which is inexcusable for someone seeking to represent our state in Congress.

Also concerning are her positions on illegal immigration and desire to expand asylum limits, which have been widely exploited by illegal immigrants.

The list goes on, but voters need to look no further than my opponent’s own website to realize her values are not aligned with most people here in South Carolina. Mine are.

Congressional District 6: Republican Buckner vs. Democrat Clyburn vs. United Citizens Party’s Dixon vs. Alliance Party’s Oddo vs. Libertarian Party’s Simpson

Duke Buckner

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: My top domestic priority will be to get the rate of inflation under control so prices for food and gas will come down. My top international priority will be to stop the invasion at our southern border of people from adversarial foreign countries.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: I would identify the most efficient energy sources that have the least adverse effect on the environment.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: End the Biden’s administration’s open border policy. I would also place a moratorium on further asylum seekers.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: The issue of abortion should be left up to the individual states and is not within the purview of the federal government. However, I believe strong families and population growth are essential to our long-term national security. Therefore, I propose free prenatal care including baby delivery services of choice for all women who are U.S. citizens regardless of income.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: The events at the U.S. Capitol on. Jan. 6, 2021 were not the peaceful transfer of power which we are accustomed to and which is one of the cornerstones of our republic. Therefore, we must restore confidence in the outcome of our elections by ensuring that we have election integrity.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponent in this election?

A: I will bring about a positive change for the 6th Congressional District. However, my opponent Cong. James Clyburn is an 83-year-old career politician. He has been in office for over 30 years. Yet his district is the poorest in South Carolina and one of the poorest in the U.S. He has held high rank in Congress, yet his district is still known for its “corridor of shame.” He supports “Bidenomics,” yet gas and food prices are up and real wages are down. Mr. Clyburn voted for the 1994 Clinton crime bill that hurt communities of color and exploded the prison population with a disproportionate amount of Black men. I will bring youth and vitality to the representation of the 6th Congressional District and convert the “corridor of shame” to the “corridor of “fame.”

Incumbent U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: Next year will mark 10 years since the tragedy at Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston that took the lives of nine parishioners and injured three others as they participated in a Bible study. Closing the deadly loophole that allowed the shooter to purchase a gun without completing a background check remains top of mind for me.

I have introduced the Enhanced Background Checks Act in Congress since 2015, and it passed the House and died in the Senate both times. I’m committed to continuing my efforts to close the Charleston loophole to ensure these dangerous weapons stay out of the wrong hands.

Reflecting on international affairs, I recall an encounter with an older Black woman I met during a voting rights event at the First Baptist Church in Montgomery, Ala., shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine. She said that she understood that voting rights was the issue that brought me to Alabama, but if we do not stop Putin, voting rights won’t matter.

History teaches us that there are global consequences to be had if we allow would-be dictators and autocrats to tramp on our rights. Today, the war is in Ukraine, but tomorrow, it could be in the home country of one of our NATO allies, or God forbid, on the soil of the United States of America. I will continue working to ensure our allies continue to receive the aid they need to defeat Russian president Vladimir Putin, preserve democracy, and support our national interests at home and abroad.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: Extreme weather events across the country, and indeed the world, provide clear, and I believe, convincing evidence, that we must address climate change. I proudly voted for President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which contained the largest American response to the climate crisis. This historic legislation will enable a clean energy transition that makes investments in electric vehicles, battery technology and clean energy like nuclear power. It provides rebates and tax credits for consumers to purchase energy efficient appliances and electric vehicles, respectively. As we make this transition, we must be careful not to leave underserved communities behind.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: I support comprehensive immigration reform that would not only secure our border and enforce already present immigration laws but also address access to legal immigration pathways and the status of undocumented immigrants already living and working in this country. I am in total support of the bipartisan border security agreement that Congressional Republicans turned their back on.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: I strongly believe that decisions about reproductive care should be made by individuals in consultation with their doctors. It is imperative that we protect the autonomy of women and the health care options available to them with the compassion, empathy and respect they deserve. I supported the guidelines as outlined in Roe v. Wade and hope the decision will once again become the law of the land.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and their aftermath?

A: Jan. 6, 2021, was an insurrection, clear and simple. The violence that unfolded that day was directly incited by the 45th president, who attempted to disrupt the peaceful transition of power and undermine the will of the American people to unjustly hold onto political power. He and his allies may not have succeeded, but they did significant damage for which we must hold them accountable if we want to continue this nation’s pursuit of “a more perfect union.” If we fail to do so, I fear the world’s greatest democracy will fail.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your eventual opponent in this election?

A: I maintain that the best predictor of future behavior is past performance. My record of delivering real results for South Carolinians is well documented. In this fiscal year, I was able to help secure $233.2 million for community projects to address inland flooding, provide telehealth to rural residents, expand critical infrastructure, and more.

I was the only member of the South Carolina delegation to support the American Rescue Plan, which provided more than 1 million South Carolinians with enhanced Child Tax Credit payments, expanded access to health care, reopened schools, kept businesses afloat to help the state recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, and provided $400 million for broadband internet.

According to the governor, because of my efforts, South Carolinians will achieve affordable, high-speed broadband internet for every household and business in the state over the next three years.

I was also the only South Carolina House Member to support the Inflation Reduction Act, which is helping 1.2 million seniors and other Medicare beneficiaries in South Carolina save money on prescription drugs and insulin costs. From the moment I was elected president of Sumter’s NAACP Youth Council at the age of 12, I have been learning that we all have roles to play in our nation’s pursuit of perfection. Ours is a great country, in no need of being made great.

We must do the things that are necessary to make our country’s greatness accessible and affordable for all, and if reelected, I will continue that pursuit.

Gregg Marcel Dixon

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: My top domestic priority will be to immediately stop mass immigration. The U.S.A. has spent hundreds of billions on illegal immigrants since the creation of the Department of Homeland Security in 2003 while actual Americans suffer, and struggle to make it. This is allowed by corporations who do not want to pay Americans a fair wage so they import cheap labor, and by corrupt politicians of both parties, but especially the Democrats, who want to import a new voter base. When people talk about voter suppression, it is the Democrats who mainly want to suppress the votes of Freedmen (those who were enslaved and emancipated by the U.S. government and their descendants) by replacing American votes with the votes of illegal immigrants who they want to give the right to vote.

My top international priority will be to pull the United States of America out of the United Nations refugee treaty. This has been taken advantage of by hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who come to the United States, claiming to be seeking asylum, who are then released into our nation and given a hearing date for which some never show up. I want us to withdraw from unnecessary conflicts that cost us trillions and a treaty that can bring foreign enemies and conflicts to our schools, our jobs, our neighborhoods, our homes. We should be able to decide if, when and how we want to offer asylum in a way that works best for us.

Editor’s note: McClatchy’s South Carolina opinion team has a policy to refer to people who cross the border illegally as undocumented immigrants, avoiding words like “illegal” to describe them. We make rare exceptions for direct quotes or official documents. Gregg Marcel Dixon’s description was published as submitted after he was offered the opportunity to change it and declined.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: In my role as the U.S. House representative for South Carolina District Six, I will form a commission that will seek to capitalize off of my district’s coastal location here in South Carolina’s Lowcountry by investing in tidal energy. Tidal energy uses the naturally rising and lowering of the rivers and oceans’ tides. This will allow America to be energy independent and bring more competition into the energy sector that will immediately bring down the sky-high prices we are seeing right now. I will also work to make major tax incentives available to construction firms, auto manufacturers and more to use the highest quality and most energy efficient methods and for American citizens to be able to take advantage of other sources of energy, such as solar energy, if they decide to do so.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: One, I will immediately move to make anyone wanting to rent or own a home to be required to prove their citizenship. Illegal immigrants are occupying the already limited number of homes we have here in the U.S.A., and that makes the costs of the remaining homes extremely unaffordable for most Americans.

Two, instead of getting more IRS agents to go after hard-working Americans barely getting by, I will push to greatly hire more Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who will quickly move to deport illegal immigrants on whom this nation spends massively while actual American citizens suffer. I will also go after the corporations who are either willingly or neglectfully hiring those here illegally. I will form a commission to investigate elected officials who are incentivizing illegal immigration or even mass immigration so that they can be held accountable. This will cause the wages of American citizens to drastically rise since now corporations will be held accountable, in the court of law, and made to pay Americans a fair wage.

Three, I will hire more immigration judges so we could immediately hear and deport illegal immigrants, and hold corporations and politicians accountable.

Lastly, I will ensure that any and all legal immigration will be to the benefit of American citizens, not the American corporations or the elected officials.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: Once a heartbeat and cerebral activity has been detected in a fetus, abortion should not be permissible unless there is a credible threat to the mother’s health, or the birth is guaranteed to not be viable.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: Those who committed any crimes on Jan. 6, 2021 at the U.S. Capitol should be held immediately accountable to the fullest extent of the law that is commensurate with their crimes. Those who did not should not be persecuted. It is that simple.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponents in this election?

A: Many people will do what is easy, the path of least resistance. Many people will do what is popular, whatever the crowd in front of them wants to hear or see done. I am an award-winning teacher of 20 years, nothing about that was easy, and in many cases, doing what was right was not always popular. I hold myself accountable to doing not what is easy, not what is popular, but what is right, and that means doing right by everyone.

Joseph Oddo

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: Our top priority is to protect our sovereignty and honor the Constitution. Over the years, very poor civic education has diminished our citizens’ sense of obligation to the republic.

All it will take is six to eight to change the fate! As a new member of Congress, my task will be to formulate a fulcrum caucus consisting of other independent-minded members who can take away the majority from either of the larger parties and draw more practical and pragmatic members to the center with the objective of actually passing legislation and getting things done. We must start with balancing the federal budget. It is embarrassing that Congress operates on continuing resolutions and does nothing to solve the long-term budgetary needs of the nation. It is costing us taxpayers dearly in driving up the deficit and leaving a deep burden of debt on future generations.

Internationally, as honorable and moral citizens of the planet, we must stop the reckless foreign intervention and the inhumane genocide that is currently being conducted by the Israeli military operation.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: More than any single issue, the health of the planet will have a more direct impact on our lives and livelihoods in the U.S. and beyond. We must protect our natural resources, and:

• Invest in national lead pipe replacement and infrastructure upgrades to guarantee access to safe and affordable drinking water.
• Promote local and community organic farming and phase out large agribusiness subsidies.
• Transition away from the big polluters controlling the Environmental Protection Agency, and from Big Pharma controlling the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health.
• Invest in future infrastructure starting with modern cross-country high speed maglev.
• Enhance national standards for clean air and water.
• Invest in applied research to rid our oceans and waterways of plastics and toxins, and technologies to extract carbon dioxide and methane from our atmosphere.
• Expand, reforest and restore millions of acres of public and recreational land and waters.
• Support sustainable agricultural, soil management and fishing practices.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: I need to better analyze solutions to this issue. We need the courage that Ronald Reagan had to finally solve immigration crises and bring those living in the darkness into the bright and opportunistic economy that the U.S. offers.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: Woman’s choice.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: I try not to favor the actions of one big legacy party over the over, but Jan. 6 was an out-of-hand episode that was fueled by the outgoing president playing victim. Rather than focusing on anything good he could provide the voters, he focuses solely on all the bad done to him. Many Americans were thrilled to join the spite as detailed in Frank Bruni’s book, “The Age of Grievance.” Trump became grudge made flesh, grievance used by a president as an incubator for anger. His party lied about the outcome of the election and stirred his supporters to violent confrontation, while the other big legacy party utilized its army of litigators to prevent third and fourth parties from gaining ballot access and legitimately participating in the process.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponents in this election?

A: I get on the ballot to flip the script on the standard media narrative by arguing that the Big Two political parties actually spoil elections for us independents. By limiting electoral marketplace competition with their uniparty monopoly that excludes all outsiders — with an assist from Big Media who doesn’t dare upset their gravy train of ad revenue — we provide alternatives to elevate the citizens’ voice above the mainstream media noise. We actively recruit and empower citizens to act, to engage in civic solutions and to stand for political office — especially since one-half of all elections in South Carolina have only one name on the ballot.

Several election reform measures should be adopted, including having open primaries in which there is only one primary, run by the state, wherein ALL candidates regardless of party affiliation compete to be on the general election ballot. The top (two, three, four or five) vote-getters would go on to the general election. They could all be from different parties or possibly all from the same party. Then in the general election (using ranked choice/instant runoff voting) the voters would choose their candidates in order of preference. In order to win, one must get over 50%. Instant runoff voting saves the state millions of dollars in expensive runoffs.

Michael Simpson

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: My top domestic and international priority would be to engage our nation into authoring a Declaration of Peace, meant for all of humanity.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: True balance involves control. We don’t control changing climate. Economic and energy concerns are different for each individual, and are therefore TBD depending on the person.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: I would first have to understand current U.S. immigration policy before suggesting any changes.

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: Neither the federal nor state government should dictate our lives, liberties or property. Abortion is a personal issue that is between a female and her doctor. That doctor has an oath they are supposed to keep and should therefore make that determination. I am not a female or a doctor and won’t make any decision for you.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and their aftermath?

A: I view it the same as everyone, as something that happened that we cannot change. There are so many opposing lessons that can be taken away from the events that occurred on that day and the “aftermath” that really all we can do is try to understand and be better people.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponents in this election?

A: Voters should vote the way they want, hopefully not out of fear or anger, but out of their personal conscience.

Congressional District 7: Republican Fry vs. Democrat Hyman

Incumbent U.S. Rep Russell Fry

Fry did not reply to our survey.

Mal Hyman

Q: What will be your top domestic and top international priority in Congress?

A: My top domestic priority is the economy. Too many working families are living paycheck to paycheck. The current $7.25 per hour minimum wage has less purchasing power than in 1968. We must raise the minimum wage to create more opportunities and stabilize families.

We must invest in education from early childhood to technical and four-year colleges. Studies show a $1 investment in early childhood education provides a $7 return in the future.

Ending overseas tax breaks and strengthening tax breaks for companies that invest in America will increase U.S. manufacturing jobs. We must end loopholes that allow some of the wealthy and some corporations to pay zero taxes. Everyone must pay their fair share.

My top international priority focuses on peace through strength and common sense. We must continue to honor our commitments to our allies when aggressively searching for diplomatic breakthroughs to end the wars in Ukraine, Gaza and Yemen. Our diplomatic efforts to build an alliance with Saudi Arabia, Israel and the U.S. should be accompanied by restarting the Iranian nuclear agreement.

Regarding Israel, there is no military solution to a political problem. We must demand an immediate ceasefire and enforcement of the Leahy law, which bars aid to countries that violate human rights. I have done human rights work in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza in 1989 as well as in 2013, and I have always argued for a two-state solution.

Q: How would you balance the changing climate with economic and energy concerns?

A: The choice is not between combating climate change and sacrificing the economy or addressing energy concerns. We’re already witnessing record heat, wildfires and droughts caused by climate change and how it impacts our health, economy and way of life. If we don’t act now, these impacts will only grow more severe, threatening future generations and the planet and imposing devastating costs on the economy.

By investing in renewable energy, protecting our natural resources and reducing carbon emissions, we can build a sustainable future while stimulating economic growth. Meeting the climate change challenge is already forcing rapid growth in sustainable energy and can create millions of good paying jobs in solar, wind, conservation and biomass. Renewable energy can also lower energy costs to consumers. For instance, solar panels are now cheaper than coal or natural gas. We must continue investing in clean energy through programs like the Inflation Reduction Act, Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and CHIPS and Science Act.

Planning for the future requires input and cooperation from regulators, utilities and energy users. As the economy grows, so does the demand for electricity for data centers, artificial intelligence, crypto mining, manufacturing and electric vehicles. It’s critical that the supply of energy and efficient distribution keep pace with economic growth.

The recent Supreme Court decision overturning Chevron deference will likely work against cooperation by opening up the possibility of litigation for every rulemaking that is issued by a federal agency. We must address the possibility of endless litigation that could stifle climate progress and economic growth.

Q: What changes would you make to U.S. immigration policy?

A: We need rational immigration reform instead of building walls and deporting all immigrants. We should recall the words of President Ronald Reagan who said in 1984, “I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally” and then signed the most recent major immigration reform bill in 1986.

We need to do away with the myths of immigration. Immigrants are not bringing fentanyl into the country. Most fentanyl comes in through ports of entry in cars and commercial vehicles.

Immigrants are not committing more crimes than U.S. citizens. Studies show that immigrants are less likely than U.S. citizens to be arrested or commit homicides.

Immigrants are good for the economy. Immigrants do not take away American jobs or depress wages. The U.S. is experiencing decades-low unemployment, an aging population and a lower birth rate that together are shrinking the labor supply. Immigrants are making up the difference, which helps keep inflation in check and improves productivity. It’s estimated that immigrants pay billions of dollars in payroll taxes a year to fund public benefits they’ll never receive.

We need a pathway to citizenship. We need to develop immigration policies recognizing that without immigration, the American economy will shrink, and understand why people are coming to the U.S. It is not solely an issue for the United States. Remembering President Reagan again, he wanted to work with Mexico to make the border “something other than the location for a fence.”

Q: In what circumstances and how late in pregnancy should abortion be legal?

A: Reproductive decisions should be made by a woman, her family and her doctor. Legislating dates like six weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks, are meant to restrict access to safe and legal abortions. It establishes a one-size-fits all standard that relies on when conception takes place and that point in time cannot be defined with certainty. The resulting chaos leaves women at risk of losing medical care and doctors at risk of being sued and losing their licenses. Almost all abortions happen before 21 weeks, and those that happen later are oftentimes accompanied by circumstances that do not fit the one-size-fits all definition. For instance, severe fetal problems and serious health risks to the patient call for as many medical options as possible. Choosing the best medical option is up to the woman, her family and her doctor, not a group of legislators who cannot possibly know the circumstances facing the woman.

Q: How do you view the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and their aftermath?

A: Whether a riot or an insurrection, the events of Jan. 6, 2021, were the result of “the big lie” that Donald Trump won the election and right-wing extremism that justifies violence as a legitimate means to achieve its ends. It was not a peaceful protest by law-abiding citizens nor was it a spontaneous expression of dissatisfaction. It was a call to arms by groups like the Proud Boys and conspiracy advocates culminating in Trump’s call for them to march to the Capital and fight.

Trump did not march with them. He returned to the White House to watch it on television. Everyone knows what happened then. The rioters breached the Capitol building, threatened lawmakers, called for Vice President Mike Pence’s hanging, injured many and left several dead. Despite calls to do something, Trump did nothing for hours.

Trump did not do his duty to ensure a peaceful transfer of power or to protect members of Congress and the public.

The aftermath is a poisoned political discourse. It was only recently that Trump admitted that Joe Biden won the election. Nevertheless, he continues to prepare his supporters for a rigged upcoming election. Regardless of the results in November. There is no telling what might happen yet again in January.

We can’t move forward if we allow hate and division to take root in our communities. Healing our political divisions starts with rejecting rhetoric and actions that incite fear and violence, and instead, focusing on building bridges and fostering understanding.

Q: Why should voters choose you over your opponent in this election?

A: As a teacher for 50 years, a human rights worker in Central America and the Middle East, and a member of local civic boards, I have tried to serve for the benefit of all people. This election, I believe everything is on the line. The plight of families, personal freedoms, the power of money and democracy itself are on the line. I decided to continue to fight for progress on the issues that matter most to workers and families. We must invest more in America to create more opportunity and security — creating more good jobs, a living wage, health care as a right, making childcare and education better and affordable, restoring reproductive rights, while protecting our environment.

I seek to serve everyone in the district. Teachers, truck drivers, business owners, workers. I’ll be the voice of the voiceless. I’ll be the first to confront the school-to-prison pipeline as someone who taught in men’s prisons and public schools. To honor freedom is to honor the Constitution. To honor freedom is to honor the Golden Rule. To honor freedom is to honor Mother Earth. I’d like to bring common sense for the common good back to the policy decisions in Washington.

This story was originally published October 7, 2024 at 6:00 AM with the headline "We asked every SC congressional candidate about issues that matter. Read the full Q&As here.."

Matthew T. Hall

Opinion Contributor,

The State

Matthew T. Hall is a former journalist for The State