Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Letters to the Editor

Letter: A better option to reduce guns

I agree with guest columnist Blaine Lotz about the need to get assault weapons out of the hands of our citizens, with mass murders (four or more persons) occurring at the rate of more than one per day. I don't think his proposal for the federal government to confiscate them is doable in the foreseeable future.

More doable would be a federal law to stop the current sale of assault weapons by anyone, phased in to allow time for citizens to sell their weapons. At the end of the phase-in period, a federally funded buy-back program would begin, implemented as a state option in those states where citizens feel safer without assault weapons, such as Connecticut. In other states, there would be no buy-back program because citizens feel safer armed to the teeth.

We could then press our South Carolina state legislators to institute a buy-back program or move to a safer state (or Canada). This state-by-state and city-by-city approach to regulating weapons is accepted by the current U.S. Supreme Court, which refused to hear an appeal against laws regulating guns in Highland Park, Ill.

John Hollender

This story was originally published December 25, 2015 at 6:11 AM with the headline "Letter: A better option to reduce guns."

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER