Vigorous enforcement of traffic laws is a necessity. Abusive enforcement prompted by incentives other than public safety is not. The use of speed cameras in Ridgeland along Interstate 95 is abusive.
Some local officials tout a study showing traffic accidents on I-95 are down since camera usage began, even though that period is too short to draw any statistically valid conclusions. Others justify the cameras as a deterrent, even though little has been done to alert out-of-state drivers.
What can be said of an enforcement regime that issues tickets to the owners of cars without absolute certainty the owner was driving? What can be said of a system relying on for-profit enterprise for enforcement?
What is to prevent Ridgeland from reducing the miles-per-hour over the speed limit threshold used for issuing a ticket?
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Island Packet
Sadly, what really drives the use of speed cameras is the revenue generated for Ridgeland and its private contractor.
The South Carolina legislature was wise in its last session to approve a statewide ban on use of such cameras, and the state should enforce compliance.
Paul S. EganSun City Hilton Head