Beaufort News

State allows some Harbor, Daufuskie island property owners to take emergency action against erosion

The back of Tricia and Lew Gardner's Harbor Island home Oct. 6, 2015.  Most of the beach behind the home was washed away by high tides and rough waves Oct. 3.
The back of Tricia and Lew Gardner's Harbor Island home Oct. 6, 2015. Most of the beach behind the home was washed away by high tides and rough waves Oct. 3. dearley@islandpacket.com
Some Daufuskie Island and Harbor Island homeowners in danger of losing property to erosion have received permission for a short-term fix, but longterm solutions will be more complicated.

The Department of Health and Environmental Control's Ocean and Coastal Resource Management division has issued eight emergency orders for property in Beaufort County, agency spokesman Jim Beasley said Friday. Four orders are for homes on Harbor Island. The remaining four are on Daufuskie.

Under the orders, homeowners are allowed to use sandbags and to bring in sand from elsewhere on the beach for minor renourishment. One of the Harbor Island orders only allows sandbags.

Possibilities for longterm fixes include a larger scale beach renourishment, with or without groins -- man-made structures that trap sand as it drifts down the beach. Homeowners could also move their houses back on the property or relocate them to another lot, Beasley said.

Ongoing issue

Erosion at Daufuskie has long been an issue. Even before this past week, two home had been deemed uninhabitable after the sand washed from beneath them.

Property owners are proposing a large-scale beach restoration. Melrose Property Owners Association has asked DHEC and the Army Corps of Engineers for permission to pump 1.4 million cubic yards of sand from the Calibogue Sound onto 5,000 feet of Daufuskie shoreline.

That application is still under review, pending an opinion from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Beasley said. Funding the project once a permit is granted be will the issue, said Mitch Evans, a property owner and past Melrose POA president.

A federal designation as an undeveloped coastal barrier prohibits the area from receiving federal grants from the work. Evans said his hope is that Beaufort County will be able to chip in and that increased property values on Daufuskie will increase the county's tax base.

At a September meeting between county leaders and the Daufuskie Island Council, state Sen. Tom Davis said he was working with U.S. Rep. Mark Sanford to update the federal maps designating the coastal areas.

The prospect was raised of using county accommodations tax money or a proposed capital sales tax commission to pay for the dredging. Property owner Len Pojednic said the Melrose association had already invested $85,000 on the beach.

"We don't expect Beaufort County to solve all of our problems," he said, according to meeting minutes.

Expensive fix

Short-term or longterm, none of the erosion-control options are cheap.

Harbor Island residents Tricia and Lew Gardner shelled out $30,000 for 150, 1-ton sandbags last year, Tricia said. Those bags were tossed around within six months, the couple said.

The Gardners then wrote Gov. Nikki Haley and Sanford, asking what could be done. The couple was directed to a wave dissipation system, the subject of a study at The Citadel.

State law restricts the use of sea walls, bulkheads and similar measures for the effect on the surrounding beach. The wave dissipation system was presented as a permeable alternative.

The wall of heavy-duty pipe works to break up waves before they reach homes and to trap sand as water recedes.

The Gardners paid $60,000 to install the system, which several neighbors also now employ. They thought it was working well until the water level cleared the wall during historic high tides and rain this past weekend.

DHEC has not reached any conclusions about the system's effectiveness and will evaluate data at the end of the study, Beasley said.

Mike Ricci, the Gardners' neighbor, also installed the system to keep waves from crashing into his house. Ricci left his home during the storms after the footings on his pilings were exposed.

He said the system has not been in place long enough to judge its effectiveness.

"In fairness, it's too early to tell," he said. "It certainly helped me in the storm; there's no doubt about that."

The Harbor Island Owners Association board of directors discussed the possibility of restoring the beach in 2011, board member Dennis Nolan said. But association rules say its funds can only be used for association property.

That does not include the beachfront owned by the homeowners, said Nolan, a retired law professor. He noted the limited options available under state and federal laws.

The board will hold its regular meeting Saturday and will discuss options of what can be done, president Craig Aull said.

"We're all very sympathetic," said Nolan, whose home is on a part of the beach not affected by erosion. "We certainly want the beach to be healthy and all the owners to have their places protected. But somebody has to make a proposal to do something."

Follow reporter Stephen Fastenau at twitter.com/IPBG_Stephen.

Related content

  Comments