Search Everything in the Lowcountry and the Coastal Empire.
Supreme Court to hear arguments concerning town smoking ban
- Photo: From left, Bob Sharp of Pittsburgh, Trey Dunlap of Bluffton and Donald Carpenter, also of Pittsburgh, talk around the outdoor fireplace at the Bluffton Ale House in January 2007. The owners of the Bluffton Ale House added outdoor amenities to
accommodate smokers after the town’s smoking ban went into effect last year.
File | The Island Packet
Enlarge Image
The power of cities and towns to ban indoor public smoking in South Carolina will be called into question before the state's highest court this week, and its decision has the potential to quash smoking bans already in effect across the state.
The argument to be heard by the South Carolina Supreme Court stems from an appeal by the city of Greenville, which had a smoking ban that went into effect a year ago. The city levied $50 fines against smokers who lit up in prohibited areas and $200 fines against businesses that allowed them to puff away. Dozens of bars and restaurants sued, saying the ban would hurt business.
In March, Judge John C. Few ended the ban. He ruled such bans are a legislative issue and cited a 1996 state law that he said prevented local governments from creating their own rules on smoking. Few's ruling contradicted a decision handed down several months earlier by Judge Deadra
Jefferson, who in December 2006 dismissed a similar challenge to a ban in Sullivans Island, saying state law did not dissuade municipalities from regulating smoking.
The Supreme Court hearing, scheduled for Wednesday, deals only with the Greenville case but experts said it has the potential to affect smoking bans across the state.
"If the Supreme Court says that this area of the law is pre-empted by the state, and individual cities and towns cannot make those types of laws, then that would have statewide application," said Charleston attorney Paul Dominick, who represents the owner of a Sullivans Island bar who challenged the ruling there.
Smokers and elected officials in Bluffton, Beaufort County and on Hilton Head Island have waited a year for the Supreme Court to weigh in on the issue to see if the local bans will be affected.
"Whatever the decision the court makes, we would of course conform our ordinance and our enforcement mechanisms to conform with the law," Hilton Head Town Council attorney Gregg Alford said.
Several restaurants and bars protested the town's decision to enact a smoking ban last year, but few reported any major changes in business after the tourist season wrapped up this fall. The Lodge, a south-end bar, tried to fight the fines it received for violating the ban in Municipal Court in June, but lost.
Since then, no violations have been reported, town attorney Brian Hulbert said.
"It's been pretty quiet since then," he said. "I think people have been complying."
The justices are expected to hear arguments from attorneys representing Greenville and the businesses challenging that city's ordinance, and officials on both sides of the issue said they're looking forward to getting some clarity because of the conflicting lower court rulings.
|
- Ocean Breeze Peeping Tom eludes capture
- Missing island statue turns up at Jasper County recycling center
- Culture, covenants collide
- Brown's Bluff owner faces four county citations
- Island free clinic gets cut of CVS lawsuit
- Finally, a break from the heat! Storm ushers in cooler temperatures
- Five minutes with: Welborn Ferrene, television editor and voice-over artist
- Opinions anything but uniform at school uniform meeting
- Rowdy drunks curse cops, get a free trip to jail
- US Navy stops pirate attack in Gulf of Aden

Feeds



