More security not always the answer

newsroom@islandpacket.comMay 21, 2014 

I take issue with a May 17 letter. I served as a foreign service officer in various posts in Africa for 10 years and had no expectation of either protection or vengeance. The Congo was a hot spot; I knew it and willingly accepted the intelligence-gathering assignment. Rwanda, Burundi, Kenya, Uganda, Ghana and Tunisia simmered and could have erupted at any time, but I regularly traveled alone. Each embassy had a small contingent of lightly-armed Marine guards that discouraged a couple of mobs, but at my eastern Congo consulate, where a rebellion was in progress, we had only our own weapons and no barriers at our home or office. I never even considered requesting additional security: the risk was the price for the privilege of serving. In fact, if there had been the kind of security apparently being advocated today, I would not have been able to do my job, and there would have been no point in being there.

Roscoe N. Sandlin


The Island Packet is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service