DEBATE OVER GAY-THEMED BOOKS

How they voted: Senate budget-writers restore funding to colleges

ccope@thestate.comApril 30, 2014 

South Carolina Senate

The South Carolina Statehouse

JEFFREY COLLINS — AP

  • How they voted

    The Senate Finance Committee voted Wednesday to restore about $70,000 in state money to two colleges – USC-Upstate and the College of Charleston – that the House voted to cut.

    Voting to restore the money the House cut:

    Paul Campbell, R-Berkeley

    John Courson, R-Richland

    Tom Davis, R-Beaufort

    Wes Hayes, R-York

    Joel Lourie, D-Richland

    John Matthews, D-Orangeburg

    Yancey McGill, D-Williamsburg

    Floyd Nicholson, D-Greenwood

    Clementa Pinckney, D-Jasper

    Nikki Setzler, D-Lexington

    Kent Williams, D-Marion

    Voting to agree with the House cuts and reduce the money:

    Thomas Alexander, R-Oconee

    Raymond Cleary, R-Georgetown

    Mike Fair, R-Greenville

    Larry Grooms, R-Berkeley

    Hugh Leatherman, R-Florence

    William O’Dell, R-Abbeville

    Harvey Peeler, R-Cherokee

    The Senate Finance Committee voted Wednesday to give legislators a $12,000 a year raise.

    Senators who voted for the raise

    Thomas Alexander, R-Oconee

    Paul Campbell, R-Berkeley

    Raymond Cleary, R-Georgetown

    Mike Fair, R-Greenville

    Larry Grooms, R-Berkeley

    Wes Hayes, R-York

    Hugh Leatherman, R-Florence

    John Matthews, D-Orangeburg

    Yancey McGill, D-Williamsburg

    Floyd Nicholson, D-Greenwood

    William O’Dell, R-Abbeville

    Clementa Pinckney, D-Jasper

    Nikki Setzler, D-Lexington

    Kent Williams, D-Marion

    Senators who voted against the raise:

    John Courson, R-Richland

    Tom Davis, R-Beaufort

    Joel Lourie, D-Richland

    Harvey Peeler, R-Cherokee

  • Budget differences

    State Senate budget writers approved spending more money in some areas than was included in the budget passed earlier this session by the S.C. House. Those areas include:

    $24.4 million in additional money to expand the state’s 4-year-old kindergarten program for at-risk students

    $25 million more for higher education; while more than the House budgeted, it is still about $6 million less than higher education received in this year’s budget

    A $300 bonus for each state employee, subject to more state revenue being forecast by the Bureau of Economic Advisors; Senate budget writers also kept the same pay raise for state employees — 1.5 percent — as adopted by the House

    $348,400 more for the state attorney general’s office to prosecute violent, gang-related and sex crimes

    Offsetting cuts: To spend more in those areas, budget writers voted to cut other areas. A complete list of those cuts was not immediately available. For more, see Friday’s State and thestate.com.

— Senate budget writers voted Wednesday to restore about $70,000 in state money to two S.C. colleges, money the S.C. House voted to cut for assigning gay-themed books.

They Senate Finance Committee also voted to give legislators, in effect, a $12,000-a-year raise.

The Senate’s Finance Committee voted 11-7 to restore the money to the budgets of the University of South Carolina-Upstate and the College of Charleston.

By removing the money, critics said legislators improperly had interfered with the academic freedom of higher education institutions.

Senators said they expect the issue to be debated again with the committee’s budget proposal goes to the full Senate, expected to happen starting Tuesday.

State Sen. Mike Fair, R-Greenville, who supported the House’s decision to cut the money, said the controversy has been uncomfortable for those who support higher education.

“I’m tired of throwing rocks,” Fair said, adding he thought the universities made efforts to respond to lawmakers’ concerns.

Still, in a show-of-hands vote, Fair joined six other senators in opposing restoring the money.

Fair said if the full Senate restores the money, that decision will debated again when a joint House-Senate conference committee meets to hammer out differences between the House and Senate budget proposals for the state’s $7 billion general fund.

That debate will be an unneeded disagreement, Fair said. “We’re not going to settle this issue of nurture or nature through the budget debate.”

A pay raise?

The pay raise — approved by a 14-4 vote — would come in the form of increasing by $1,000 a month the in-district expenses that lawmakers are paid. Legislators currently are paid $1,000 a month for those expenses. If approved, that stipend would increase to $24,000 a year.

In addition, legislators are paid an annual salary of $10,400.

The last legislative increase was approved almost 20 years ago in 1995, said Senate Finance Committee chairman Hugh Leatherman, R-Florence. Some legislative districts span five or six counties, Leatherman said, making travel expenses hefty to meet with constituents.

However, the pay raise idea, which was not included in the House’s budget proposal, could face stiff opposition.

Two Senate leaders — President Pro Tem John Courson, R-Richland, and Senate Majority Leader Harvey Peeler — voted against the pay increase as did Sens. Joel Lourie, D-Richland, and Tom Davis, R-Beaufort.

Reach Cope at (803) 771-8657.

The Island Packet is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service