rss
mobile
Feeds
The answer is quite simple: The former has an interest in preserving natural resources in America and the latter is a movement that has a political agenda to destroy capitalism.
Some might not like or agree with this comparison, but history is proving it to be true.
We are being told by environmentalists that Americans need to deal with our considerable energy problems with impractical solutions (the list is too long to mention), when it has become evident that America has the ability to provide all of our energy needs for more than 100 years without importing a drop of oil from Middle Eastern and other anti-American producers.
The primary reason we are unable to tap into these home-grown resources is because the environmentalist movement is using every legal trick in the book to stop the development of nuclear energy and stop all attempts to drillin the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and all attempts to exploit the Bakken oil fields and other sites known to have substantial quantities of oil and gas.
While these same environmentalist have been exposed for the frauds they are on global warming (aka climate change), they still hold sway on energy.
America needs a Congress and a president who can stop this anti-capitalist movement. It is obvious that those in charge are part of the problem and not the solution.
Can November 2010 come fast enough?
Tom Hatfield
Hilton Head Island
